Company execs worried about personal information being leaked, customer lists being stolen, and credit cards being used fraudulently. Providing guidance to operating managers or C-level leaders was seen as the board’s role by 41% of respondents, participating in a tabletop exercise (TTX) was mentioned by 14% of the respondents, and general awareness or “standing by to respond should the board be needed” was mentioned by 23% of Directors.Ĭybersecurity is about more than protecting data.īack in the “old days,” protecting organizations from cyber incidents was primarily seen as protecting data.įive things directors need to know about cybersecurity.īut 23% of respondents also said there was no board plan or strategy in place.īuilding on our findings, we developed the following recommendations for what Boards of Directors need to know, actionable steps directors can take, and smart questions you should ask at your next meeting. While 50% of respondents said there had been discussion of the board’s role, there was no consensus about what that role should be. When it comes to understanding the board’s role, there were several options. Unfortunately, 9% said it wasn’t something their board discussed. We asked directors how often cybersecurity was discussed by the board and found that only 68% of respondents said regularly or constantly. We conducted a survey to better understand how boards deal with cybersecurity. Many directors know this, but still seek answers on how to proceed. They must be knowledgeable leaders who prioritize cybersecurity and personally demonstrate their commitment. Directors can no longer abdicate oversight of cybersecurity or simply delegate it to operating managers. For Boards of Directors (BODs), this requires developing new ways to carry out their fiduciary responsibility to shareholders, and oversight responsibility for managing business risk. We need new leadership approaches as we move into the next phase of securing our organizations. For every new technology that cybersecurity professionals invent, it’s only a matter of time until malicious actors find a way around it.The term “doki doki” has, it’s fair to say, been somewhat subsumed in the West by Doki Doki Literature Club!, 2017’s enormously popular VN about love in a high school club. Within Japan, it’s far better recognised as the ideophone for a heartbeat, and has been in the name of games going back to the Famicon. So it’s clearly the perfect choice for a game about falling in love with small towns.īecause in order to pillage a village, you’re going to need a grillage permillage that avoids emotional spillage. You’re going to need to listen to the village’s needs, desires, and interests. So, there are likely some immediate concerns here. Viking pillaging, historically, is perhaps not renowned for its respectful and consent-based approach to invasion. Then there are the implicit issues of all these dating games, where the line between being empathic and coercive is always deeply blurred. In the end, no matter how it’s dressed up, it’s about trying to get laid. And as such, I’ve long struggled to recognise a significant difference between the wokewashed world of “progressive” dating sims, and the infinite spew of misogynistic hentai fuckathons released every day on Steam. Yet, it’s superbly safe to say DDR does not merit any such concerns. It certainly helps that DDR‘s dialogue makes this distinction somewhat irrelevant.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |